University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · Psychiatry
匿名 · 审核后公开
2.0分均分 · 1 条公开评价
公开评价概览
评价数
1
均分
2.0 分
点赞/踩
0 / 0
匿名表态 · 每个导师仅一次
学生评价
2.0分
## Advisor Style & Mentorship Sink or swim. Nothing is ever his fault, and if it was, it's because you made him do it. In lab meetings he will constantly interrupt the presenter and mansplain the topic back to the student. I once watched him interrupt a postdoc so much that he basically gave the talk on the postdoc's topic. He mostly checks in on people by enforcing mandatory daily summaries of your work in onenote, and using a project management system. If you are in his good graces, this is not a problem. But the second he dislikes a person, he suddenly finds mistakes in their work and starts micromanaging them hard.
## Expectations for PhD Students Work 60 hours a week. Things can go wrong, but you need to tell him immediately.
## Funding & Support Flavio is, for all his flaws an incredibly good fundraiser. He is very good at attracting R01 grants, but not so good at retaining the people he hires with those r01 grants. In one year he lost 3 postdocs and one assistant professor. 3 of these were fired, one quit because they couldn't stand the lab culture and was unable to publish papers with the group.
## Research The research is good. The EEG lab runs like clockwork, the neurostimulation works well. There are some concerns about the outsize effect sizes this group produces, but that could also be because they are running a very tight ship.
## Lab Culture The lab culture revolves around managing Flavio. He seems to have good and bad swings that will develop over the course of 6 months to a year. If you sign up to work with Flavio, expect informal meetings where students discuss whether or not to raise issues with him this week.
Sink or swim. Nothing is ever his fault, and if it was, it's because you made him do it. In lab meetings he will constantly interrupt the presenter and mansplain the topic back to the student. I once watched him interrupt a postdoc so much that he basically gave the talk on the postdoc's topic. He mostly checks in on people by enforcing mandatory daily summaries of your work in onenote, and using a project management system. If you are in his good graces, this is not a problem. But the second he dislikes a person, he suddenly finds mistakes in their work and starts micromanaging them hard.
## Expectations for PhD Students
Work 60 hours a week. Things can go wrong, but you need to tell him immediately.
## Funding & Support
Flavio is, for all his flaws an incredibly good fundraiser. He is very good at attracting R01 grants, but not so good at retaining the people he hires with those r01 grants. In one year he lost 3 postdocs and one assistant professor. 3 of these were fired, one quit because they couldn't stand the lab culture and was unable to publish papers with the group.
## Research
The research is good. The EEG lab runs like clockwork, the neurostimulation works well. There are some concerns about the outsize effect sizes this group produces, but that could also be because they are running a very tight ship.
## Lab Culture
The lab culture revolves around managing Flavio. He seems to have good and bad swings that will develop over the course of 6 months to a year. If you sign up to work with Flavio, expect informal meetings where students discuss whether or not to raise issues with him this week.
No, I don't recommend this PI.